<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News: Music Blog Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/</link>
	<description>&#124; therisingstorm.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:08:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory E. Turner</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-130147</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory E. Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/?p=1030#comment-130147</guid>
		<description>Major artists are flocking to Tunecore. Bye bye major labels. I like the recommendation they got from one artist who said it&#039;s like major promotion but without the cheap suits. Ouch and hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major artists are flocking to Tunecore. Bye bye major labels. I like the recommendation they got from one artist who said it&#8217;s like major promotion but without the cheap suits. Ouch and hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chabrell Igan</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-53917</link>
		<dc:creator>Chabrell Igan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/?p=1030#comment-53917</guid>
		<description>God dag! Kan jag ladda ner en bild fran din blogg. Av sak med hanvisning till din webbplats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God dag! Kan jag ladda ner en bild fran din blogg. Av sak med hanvisning till din webbplats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ib</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-7450</link>
		<dc:creator>ib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/?p=1030#comment-7450</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Paul. I just realised how tetchy I was just there. I agree that &quot;responsible blogging is good for the industry&quot; in the same way you outline as promotion, but I do think in addition to that individuals follow links to purchase that music promoted legitimately either on impulse, or after the fact from a record store or what have you. 

Therefore, it can benefit the artist both directly and indirectly. I don&#039;t care to imagine seeing any visitor electronically tagged, however, in order to quantify his or her purchasing habits.

The question was worded:
&quot;I use filesharing sites and programs knowing that the artist will not receive any money&quot;

I don&#039;t use filesharing programs like Limewire or the old Napster - although I have done in the past - and for this reason and those others I mentioned I checked the box marked &quot;disagree&quot;.

There is always an inherent drawback in multiple choice answer questionnaires in that they are drawn up to elicit a predetermined response. There is the short answer, and the longer reply where elucidation is required to make sense of it.

I don&#039;t think this survey goes far enough - as I mentioned earlier, I have reservations regarding it - but it does raise as many questions as those posed, and goes a step further towards creating dialogue with those who would wish to simply &quot;close the fuckers down&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Paul. I just realised how tetchy I was just there. I agree that &#8220;responsible blogging is good for the industry&#8221; in the same way you outline as promotion, but I do think in addition to that individuals follow links to purchase that music promoted legitimately either on impulse, or after the fact from a record store or what have you. </p>
<p>Therefore, it can benefit the artist both directly and indirectly. I don&#8217;t care to imagine seeing any visitor electronically tagged, however, in order to quantify his or her purchasing habits.</p>
<p>The question was worded:<br />
&#8220;I use filesharing sites and programs knowing that the artist will not receive any money&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t use filesharing programs like Limewire or the old Napster &#8211; although I have done in the past &#8211; and for this reason and those others I mentioned I checked the box marked &#8220;disagree&#8221;.</p>
<p>There is always an inherent drawback in multiple choice answer questionnaires in that they are drawn up to elicit a predetermined response. There is the short answer, and the longer reply where elucidation is required to make sense of it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this survey goes far enough &#8211; as I mentioned earlier, I have reservations regarding it &#8211; but it does raise as many questions as those posed, and goes a step further towards creating dialogue with those who would wish to simply &#8220;close the fuckers down&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ib</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-7448</link>
		<dc:creator>ib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/?p=1030#comment-7448</guid>
		<description>Paul, at the risk of being pedantic; as I mentioned previously I don&#039;t put up entire albums on my site and I always carry links to commercial outlets such as Amazon. I can see from activity on my site that visitors frequently follow those links. If they are purchasing product then I am presuming the artists are receiving their cut.

Blogs are not &quot;filesharing&quot; in the same fashion as Limewire or Napster. Have you seen the links on my site and on &quot;The Rising Storm&quot; ? 

Are you awake yet ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, at the risk of being pedantic; as I mentioned previously I don&#8217;t put up entire albums on my site and I always carry links to commercial outlets such as Amazon. I can see from activity on my site that visitors frequently follow those links. If they are purchasing product then I am presuming the artists are receiving their cut.</p>
<p>Blogs are not &#8220;filesharing&#8221; in the same fashion as Limewire or Napster. Have you seen the links on my site and on &#8220;The Rising Storm&#8221; ? </p>
<p>Are you awake yet ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-7447</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/?p=1030#comment-7447</guid>
		<description>ib,

Isn&#039;t it pretty much undisputed that the artists aren&#039;t getting any money as a direct result of downloads from mp3 blogs (even the ones the follow the mp3 bloggers code of conduct)?  If so, then anybody who downloads from any mp3 blog would have to answer &quot;agree&quot; to the question at issue.  Unless the downloader mistakenly believes that the artists are getting paid by the bloggers.

Isn&#039;t an mp3 blog a &quot;filesharing site&quot;?

My view is that responsible blogging is good for the industry.  This view is backed up by the facts that (1) the industry allows blogs to exist, openly, and (2) promotes its artists to mp3 bloggers.  But any profit to the artists is indirect.  So I don&#039;t think the question is unfair.  Maybe just a little vague.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ib,</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it pretty much undisputed that the artists aren&#8217;t getting any money as a direct result of downloads from mp3 blogs (even the ones the follow the mp3 bloggers code of conduct)?  If so, then anybody who downloads from any mp3 blog would have to answer &#8220;agree&#8221; to the question at issue.  Unless the downloader mistakenly believes that the artists are getting paid by the bloggers.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t an mp3 blog a &#8220;filesharing site&#8221;?</p>
<p>My view is that responsible blogging is good for the industry.  This view is backed up by the facts that (1) the industry allows blogs to exist, openly, and (2) promotes its artists to mp3 bloggers.  But any profit to the artists is indirect.  So I don&#8217;t think the question is unfair.  Maybe just a little vague.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ib</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-7419</link>
		<dc:creator>ib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/?p=1030#comment-7419</guid>
		<description>TAKE THE FUCKING POLYGRAPH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAKE THE FUCKING POLYGRAPH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ib</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-7417</link>
		<dc:creator>ib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/?p=1030#comment-7417</guid>
		<description>I had concerns too, boyhowdy, but I entered disagree on that particular question since it led with &quot;I don&#039;t care about artists not receiving any money...&quot; Bullshit! 

If you read the wording if really wasn&#039;t asking you to confirm that you admit to file-sharing, and that question WAS optional anyway.  had concerns too, boyhowdy, but I entered disagree on that particular question since it led with “I don’t care about artists not receiving any money…” Bullshit!

If you read the wording if really wasn’t asking you to confirm that you admit to file-sharing, and that question WAS optional anyway. There was a hint of McCarthyism about that one though, I&#039;ll grant you.

LIVE AT THE WITCH TRIALS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had concerns too, boyhowdy, but I entered disagree on that particular question since it led with &#8220;I don&#8217;t care about artists not receiving any money&#8230;&#8221; Bullshit! </p>
<p>If you read the wording if really wasn&#8217;t asking you to confirm that you admit to file-sharing, and that question WAS optional anyway.  had concerns too, boyhowdy, but I entered disagree on that particular question since it led with “I don’t care about artists not receiving any money…” Bullshit!</p>
<p>If you read the wording if really wasn’t asking you to confirm that you admit to file-sharing, and that question WAS optional anyway. There was a hint of McCarthyism about that one though, I&#8217;ll grant you.</p>
<p>LIVE AT THE WITCH TRIALS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boyhowdy</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-7403</link>
		<dc:creator>boyhowdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/?p=1030#comment-7403</guid>
		<description>See, despite disclaimers, I had major concerns about filling out the survey once I saw the question about wholesale piracy.    Samples are one thing; admitting to peer to peer downloading is quite another.  

I did the survey, but I&#039;ll withhold judgement on the results until I see how that question is help up -- if the querents make any claims at all about that part of the issue, I&#039;m crying foul pretty quick, in fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, despite disclaimers, I had major concerns about filling out the survey once I saw the question about wholesale piracy.    Samples are one thing; admitting to peer to peer downloading is quite another.  </p>
<p>I did the survey, but I&#8217;ll withhold judgement on the results until I see how that question is help up &#8212; if the querents make any claims at all about that part of the issue, I&#8217;m crying foul pretty quick, in fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ib</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-7361</link>
		<dc:creator>ib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/?p=1030#comment-7361</guid>
		<description>Way to go, Jon. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go, Jon. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/music-blog-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-7360</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/?p=1030#comment-7360</guid>
		<description>Oh, I definitely filled it out. Some good may come of this yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I definitely filled it out. Some good may come of this yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

