<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Guess Who? &#8220;It&#8217;s Time&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/</link>
	<description>&#124; therisingstorm.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 04:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Heeb</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/comment-page-1/#comment-487385</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Heeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/#comment-487385</guid>
		<description>I actually have a green vinyl copy of the album; signed by Randy Bachman, Burton Cummings, Gary Peterson and Jim Kale. I recieved it from Randy during the Pan AM games in August of 1999. I am trying to find out specificaly how many of these albums were produced?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have a green vinyl copy of the album; signed by Randy Bachman, Burton Cummings, Gary Peterson and Jim Kale. I recieved it from Randy during the Pan AM games in August of 1999. I am trying to find out specificaly how many of these albums were produced?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freqazoidiac</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/comment-page-1/#comment-8659</link>
		<dc:creator>freqazoidiac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/#comment-8659</guid>
		<description>Amazing album.just a revelation. Too bad it got put under back in &#039;66.
The LP got two runs, as there is a blue label and a maroon label. I think
someone mentioned  there was a MONO and a STEREO release.  
Regardless, of what version the Legend reissue is, it&#039;s got some ass kicking good sound.
This CD is a very good version to grab, and it will save you literally hundreds of dollars...if you 
are unlucky to find one on vinyl.. believe me..it&#039;s tough, have been collecting vinyl here in Ontario canada for almost 20 years, and have never seen a copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing album.just a revelation. Too bad it got put under back in &#8217;66.<br />
The LP got two runs, as there is a blue label and a maroon label. I think<br />
someone mentioned  there was a MONO and a STEREO release.<br />
Regardless, of what version the Legend reissue is, it&#8217;s got some ass kicking good sound.<br />
This CD is a very good version to grab, and it will save you literally hundreds of dollars&#8230;if you<br />
are unlucky to find one on vinyl.. believe me..it&#8217;s tough, have been collecting vinyl here in Ontario canada for almost 20 years, and have never seen a copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keltie Harding</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/comment-page-1/#comment-5959</link>
		<dc:creator>Keltie Harding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/#comment-5959</guid>
		<description>Hi there.

Here&#039;s some background info on the re-issue of &quot;It&#039;s Time&quot; as well as the other 2 Quality/Legend Records issues &quot;Shakin&#039; All Over&quot; &amp; &quot;Hey Ho (What You Do To Me)&quot;.

I had contacted the National Library of Canada&#039;s music division regarding the Randy Bachman collection (his collection of tapes, discs, memorabillia, ect) and specifically the &quot;early&quot; Guess Who/Quality Records recordings.  Richard Green from the music division was very helpful.  The NLC had master reels that Randy had obtained from Selkirk (which bought out Quality in the 1980&#039;s), and also mint original pressings of the first 3 albums. The &quot;Quality&quot; masters were on several reels, jumbled together with different GW tracks.  (Remember, Quality put out a few compilations and leased  out the tracks after the GW hit it big, so the original &quot;master&quot; compilations of the first 3 albums do not (possibly) exist anymore.)  The NLC did transfers off both the master reels AND the original vinyl pressings.  What versions Randy and Legend records decided to use for the reissues is still unknown to me.  Its miraculous that these tapes survived at all.

Also, the &quot;3 &quot;Legend&quot; CD&#039;s are processed to simulate stereo, and I don&#039;t know if this because Quality re-mastered the tapes in the late &#039;60&#039;s for &quot;stereo&quot; (for their compilations and the leasing copies) or if this was done &quot;post-tape transfer&quot;.  Another theory is that the &quot;mono&quot; tapes were played back on a 2- track machine during the transfer, which introduces sound problems to begin with.  A close listen  of the CD&#039;s on headphones will reveal one &quot;channel&quot; sounds &quot;dirtier&quot; than the other.   Again, I am unable to get this clarified.  That&#039;s one reason why the sound isn&#039;t quite right.  They sound MUCH better when I flick the &quot;mono&quot; switch on my amp.  

The audible tape &quot;glitch&quot; on &quot;Baby Feelin&#039;&quot; is also apparent on the original vinyl pressing.  Maybe the tape got damaged at the plant, maybe it&#039;s a bad edit splice.  Who knows.  That was 42 years ago. 

Amazingly, however, the songs that appear on &quot;It&#039;s Time&quot;  and the other 2 CD&#039;s  appear in better sound quality (with some tracks appearing for the first time in STEREO!!!) on the Sundazed collection &quot;Shakin&#039; All Over&quot;.  I did not get a reply from Sundazed yet, but I believe they used some of the tapes that were originally in the &quot;Scepter&quot; records archives.  Or maybe they used the NCL tapes and this time the transfers were done with better gear. Again, this needs to be confirmed.  I know the Scepter subsidiary &quot;Wand&quot; used some true stereo mixes on thier 1969 compilation &quot;Made In Canada - Sown &amp; Grown&quot;&quot;.  I have this LP.  It has a very unique version of &quot;One Day&quot; that was recorded at Scepter in 1965 and has a slightly faster tempo with a &quot;poppier&quot; feel than the &quot;It&#039;s Time&quot; version.  This mix has never been issued since, making this particular album a collector&#039;s item.  

Anyhoo, just some background info on this album and its reissue.  Hope it was informative and entertaining.  Cheers.

Keltie Harding
Shoeless Wonder Productions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some background info on the re-issue of &#8220;It&#8217;s Time&#8221; as well as the other 2 Quality/Legend Records issues &#8220;Shakin&#8217; All Over&#8221; &amp; &#8220;Hey Ho (What You Do To Me)&#8221;.</p>
<p>I had contacted the National Library of Canada&#8217;s music division regarding the Randy Bachman collection (his collection of tapes, discs, memorabillia, ect) and specifically the &#8220;early&#8221; Guess Who/Quality Records recordings.  Richard Green from the music division was very helpful.  The NLC had master reels that Randy had obtained from Selkirk (which bought out Quality in the 1980&#8242;s), and also mint original pressings of the first 3 albums. The &#8220;Quality&#8221; masters were on several reels, jumbled together with different GW tracks.  (Remember, Quality put out a few compilations and leased  out the tracks after the GW hit it big, so the original &#8220;master&#8221; compilations of the first 3 albums do not (possibly) exist anymore.)  The NLC did transfers off both the master reels AND the original vinyl pressings.  What versions Randy and Legend records decided to use for the reissues is still unknown to me.  Its miraculous that these tapes survived at all.</p>
<p>Also, the &#8220;3 &#8220;Legend&#8221; CD&#8217;s are processed to simulate stereo, and I don&#8217;t know if this because Quality re-mastered the tapes in the late &#8217;60&#8242;s for &#8220;stereo&#8221; (for their compilations and the leasing copies) or if this was done &#8220;post-tape transfer&#8221;.  Another theory is that the &#8220;mono&#8221; tapes were played back on a 2- track machine during the transfer, which introduces sound problems to begin with.  A close listen  of the CD&#8217;s on headphones will reveal one &#8220;channel&#8221; sounds &#8220;dirtier&#8221; than the other.   Again, I am unable to get this clarified.  That&#8217;s one reason why the sound isn&#8217;t quite right.  They sound MUCH better when I flick the &#8220;mono&#8221; switch on my amp.  </p>
<p>The audible tape &#8220;glitch&#8221; on &#8220;Baby Feelin&#8217;&#8221; is also apparent on the original vinyl pressing.  Maybe the tape got damaged at the plant, maybe it&#8217;s a bad edit splice.  Who knows.  That was 42 years ago. </p>
<p>Amazingly, however, the songs that appear on &#8220;It&#8217;s Time&#8221;  and the other 2 CD&#8217;s  appear in better sound quality (with some tracks appearing for the first time in STEREO!!!) on the Sundazed collection &#8220;Shakin&#8217; All Over&#8221;.  I did not get a reply from Sundazed yet, but I believe they used some of the tapes that were originally in the &#8220;Scepter&#8221; records archives.  Or maybe they used the NCL tapes and this time the transfers were done with better gear. Again, this needs to be confirmed.  I know the Scepter subsidiary &#8220;Wand&#8221; used some true stereo mixes on thier 1969 compilation &#8220;Made In Canada &#8211; Sown &amp; Grown&#8221;".  I have this LP.  It has a very unique version of &#8220;One Day&#8221; that was recorded at Scepter in 1965 and has a slightly faster tempo with a &#8220;poppier&#8221; feel than the &#8220;It&#8217;s Time&#8221; version.  This mix has never been issued since, making this particular album a collector&#8217;s item.  </p>
<p>Anyhoo, just some background info on this album and its reissue.  Hope it was informative and entertaining.  Cheers.</p>
<p>Keltie Harding<br />
Shoeless Wonder Productions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/comment-page-1/#comment-5908</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/#comment-5908</guid>
		<description>Look, no hard feelings intended, ok? But the point of our site is to encourage people to seek out these records in full, via official CD or vinyl releases. The samples provided are usually around 160-192kbs though I&#039;m sure we&#039;ve slipped some 128s up (we have several contributors and not enough time to ensure consistency w/ regards to encoding).  Files are purposely degraded in this manner so that folks who spend the time and money tracking down these records are gaining seriously more value than what we&#039;ve already provided.

I realize, and respect, that you are listening very carefully to the technical sound quality in these recordings. For what it&#039;s worth, I enjoy all of the music posted on this site a great deal, regardless of the lame encoding or sample rate. 

I hate to make an assumption, as I said, no hard feelings (we appreciate feedback of any nature), but if you are working on a project that truly requires sound files of pristine SQ, my guess is that you should be talking to the original artists or labels rather than searching the internet for free downloads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, no hard feelings intended, ok? But the point of our site is to encourage people to seek out these records in full, via official CD or vinyl releases. The samples provided are usually around 160-192kbs though I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ve slipped some 128s up (we have several contributors and not enough time to ensure consistency w/ regards to encoding).  Files are purposely degraded in this manner so that folks who spend the time and money tracking down these records are gaining seriously more value than what we&#8217;ve already provided.</p>
<p>I realize, and respect, that you are listening very carefully to the technical sound quality in these recordings. For what it&#8217;s worth, I enjoy all of the music posted on this site a great deal, regardless of the lame encoding or sample rate. </p>
<p>I hate to make an assumption, as I said, no hard feelings (we appreciate feedback of any nature), but if you are working on a project that truly requires sound files of pristine SQ, my guess is that you should be talking to the original artists or labels rather than searching the internet for free downloads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/comment-page-1/#comment-5907</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/#comment-5907</guid>
		<description>I realize its a record. I grew up with records. I have thousands of these. Records sound better than CD&#039;s. However, the poor sound of the tracks distracts from enjoying the music.  I&#039;m not knocking that this is available, but I would like to obtain a clean copy. I can&#039;t even clean it up with advanced audio tools without further degrading the sound. I have remixed it, which does hide some of the flaws, but that in itself takes away from the orginal recording. I am compilling Canadian stuff like this with bands such as Witness Inc. (Streetheart) 49th Parallel, Checkerlads, etc..  All I need is some of the very early Guess Who stuff and my first volume is complete. However, the tracks must be as pristine as possible or fixable, but these tracks cannot be fixed so they can be enjoyed. I guess I&#039;ll have to buy the CD&#039;s. Even if an mp3 is available, everybody in the world seems to encode at 128kps (crap quality). 192 isn&#039;t bad but still isn&#039;t CD quality sound. Its about the same quality as a cassette tape. As I stated, all music should be encoded with Lame, varible bit rate/joint stereo. The difference between the orginal and CD is not distinguishable unless you are a dog. I did manage do download all three early albums at once (torrent). Every song is bits and pieces of the orginal. Duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>I realize its a record. I grew up with records. I have thousands of these. Records sound better than CD&#8217;s. However, the poor sound of the tracks distracts from enjoying the music.  I&#8217;m not knocking that this is available, but I would like to obtain a clean copy. I can&#8217;t even clean it up with advanced audio tools without further degrading the sound. I have remixed it, which does hide some of the flaws, but that in itself takes away from the orginal recording. I am compilling Canadian stuff like this with bands such as Witness Inc. (Streetheart) 49th Parallel, Checkerlads, etc..  All I need is some of the very early Guess Who stuff and my first volume is complete. However, the tracks must be as pristine as possible or fixable, but these tracks cannot be fixed so they can be enjoyed. I guess I&#8217;ll have to buy the CD&#8217;s. Even if an mp3 is available, everybody in the world seems to encode at 128kps (crap quality). 192 isn&#8217;t bad but still isn&#8217;t CD quality sound. Its about the same quality as a cassette tape. As I stated, all music should be encoded with Lame, varible bit rate/joint stereo. The difference between the orginal and CD is not distinguishable unless you are a dog. I did manage do download all three early albums at once (torrent). Every song is bits and pieces of the orginal. Duh.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/comment-page-1/#comment-5895</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/#comment-5895</guid>
		<description>Hey it&#039;s a Garage record from &#039;66. Try turning it up louder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey it&#8217;s a Garage record from &#8217;66. Try turning it up louder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Daniels</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/comment-page-1/#comment-5894</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/#comment-5894</guid>
		<description>I downloaded the mp3 files are they are infested with poor sound quality. Loud clicks, distorted sections, loud thuds, etc.  Is this because a poor encoder was used or is this the actual sound on the recordings? Lame should always be used (variable bit rate/joint stereo. Research will confirm it is the best encoder, bar none. I cannot use these files as the quality is terrible. I will gladly buy this cd, but if the sound is actually on the recording then what&#039;s the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded the mp3 files are they are infested with poor sound quality. Loud clicks, distorted sections, loud thuds, etc.  Is this because a poor encoder was used or is this the actual sound on the recordings? Lame should always be used (variable bit rate/joint stereo. Research will confirm it is the best encoder, bar none. I cannot use these files as the quality is terrible. I will gladly buy this cd, but if the sound is actually on the recording then what&#8217;s the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/#comment-871</guid>
		<description>I have some of the later albums such as American Woman, Canned Wheat and so forth.  They are all good but I never got around to hearing Wheatfield Soul from 1968.  Is this any good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some of the later albums such as American Woman, Canned Wheat and so forth.  They are all good but I never got around to hearing Wheatfield Soul from 1968.  Is this any good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/comment-page-1/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therisingstorm.net/the-guess-who-its-time/#comment-870</guid>
		<description>The Guess Who are a very underated band. They seem to be remembered most for their string of AM hits, but there was alot more going on that just those hits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Guess Who are a very underated band. They seem to be remembered most for their string of AM hits, but there was alot more going on that just those hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.381 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-04-18 01:16:09 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
